menstrual period - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

menstruation - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

MEN syndrome - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

mental health - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

mental health counselor - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

Menu - permalink

All > Law > E-DiscoveryAll > Technology > Records ManagementAll > Technology > Telecommunications

MEO - permalink

All > Technology > DefenseAll > Technology > Telecommunications

meperidine - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

Mepps spinners - permalink

All > Recreation > Fishing

MER - permalink

All > Technology > Defense

mercaptopurine - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

MERCAST - permalink

All > Technology > Telecommunications

merchant banking - permalink

All > Business > Banking

merchant-ship broadcast system (MERCAST) - permalink

All > Technology > Telecommunications

mercury - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

Mercury barometer - permalink

All > Science > Climate ChangeAll > Science > Weather

Mercury Cadmium Telluride (HCT) - permalink

All > Technology > Defense

mercy killing - permalink

All > Medicine > Cancer

mere descriptiveness - permalink

All > Law > Intellectual Property > Trademark
  • statutory basis (Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(e)(1), TMEP 1209 et seq) for refusing registration of trademarks and service marks because the proposed mark merely describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the specified goods or services. With regard to trademark significance, matter may be categorized along a continuum, ranging from marks that are highly distinctive to matter that is a generic name for the goods or services.

    The degree of descriptiveness can be determined only by considering it in relation to the specific goods or services. At one extreme are marks that are completely arbitrary or fanciful. Next on the continuum are suggestive marks, followed by merely descriptive matter. Finally, generic terms for the goods or services are at the opposite end of the continuum from arbitrary or fanciful marks.

    The major reasons for not protecting descriptive marks are: (1) to prevent the owner of a mark from inhibiting competition in the sale of particular goods or services; and (2) to maintain freedom of the public to use the language involved, thus avoiding the possibility of harassing infringement suits by the registrant against others who use the mark when advertising or describing their own products. (See also Descriptive Mark)
    USPTO - Cite This Source - This Definition
  • Browse Related Terms:   arbitrary marks,   conflicting marks,   descriptive mark,   Fastener Quality Act,   FQA,   likelihood of confusion,   Native American Tribal Insignia,   substantive reasons for refusal

Merge - permalink

All > Law > E-DiscoveryAll > Technology > Telecommunications > Mobile > Android
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113